[16:01:03] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Hallo
[16:01:31] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> There are a couple of recently-added messages that use "composition" with "fragment", and I'm not entirely sure what they mean
[16:02:10] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> For example, `apihelp-abstractwiki run fragment-param-fragment`. Is it "composition" in the sense of "a type of implementation", or is it something else?
[16:02:23] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> My intuition tells me that it's something else, but I'm not sure.
[16:02:37] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> The messages are:
[16:02:39] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> "A fragment composition JSON. It should be a valid ZObject and should output an object of type HTML Fragment/Z89"
[16:02:46] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> and:
[16:02:47] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> "Run a fragment with a composition that uses qid and language arguments"
[16:48:51] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> IIRC, it's short for Z89 "HTML fragments" (HTML code that is not a full and complete HTML page) (re @amire80: There are a couple of recently-added messages that use "composition" with "fragment", and I'm not entirely sure what they mean)
[16:51:16] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Yes, that's what "fragment" is, but what exactly is "composition" in this context? Perhaps it's just the English word "composition" without any special meaning, but since Wikifunctions does use the word "composition" with a special meaning in most other contexts, I wanted to check.
[16:55:26] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> ah, it was obviously the "language" of implementations for me
[16:55:26] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> but know that you point to it, I'm only 60 % sure now...
[17:32:00] <wm-bb>	 <harej> "composition" as "written thing" vs. "composition" as "functions inside of functions"
[18:01:14] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> Gentle reminder that the Corner is in 30 minutes. See you there! (re @Sannita: Hi all! Our next Volunteers' Corner will be held on Monday, March 2, at 18:30 UTC.
[18:01:16] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> If you have questions or ideas to discuss, o...)
[19:46:22] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> ... or "putting together several pieces of HTML". My guess is that this is the actual meaning here, but I wanted to verify. (re @harej: "composition" as "written thing" vs. "composition" as "functions inside of functions")