[14:14:07] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> 852
[14:14:27] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> 3252
[14:25:05] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> Please can I ask the following question? As a non-functioneer, is it possible for me to test my composition implementation without asking for connection? I can make the function, implementation and test and I know I am not allowed to connect the implementation to the function. I have not been able to find any way to execute the implementation, the "Run function"
[14:25:05] <wm-bb>	 command is alw <clipped message>
[14:25:07] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> ays greyed out with the message that no implemenation is connected.  But I thought that previously it was possible.
[14:32:38] <wm-bb>	 <sunmem> I believe you can use "Try this implementation" in the implementation page and test with manual input.
[14:34:07] <wm-bb>	 <sunmem> you should also see the results of the implementation with the test cases on the function page even if they are not connected
[14:45:51] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> Thanks for your help,  I believed that too, but it did worked for me today.  But the implementation has been connected now and I have a different question.
[14:46:32] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Don't ask to ask! What is it? (re @Richard: Thanks for your help,  I believed that too, but it did worked for me today.  But the implementation has been connected now and I...)
[14:47:24] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> To my question above, huit answered. Now I'll ask the new question.
[14:50:39] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> My function is Z36106 with implementation Z36113, which works nicely on the function page manually and also the test works.  But now I go to the implementation and enter the same test, which gives the wrong result "France es un país en Europa." instead of "Francia es un país en Europa."
[14:51:50] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> How is this possible?  It calls intermediate function Z26337 which works for me
[14:52:17] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> Is this a caching problem?
[14:54:10] <wm-bb>	 <sunmem> works for me. i think it is caching issue : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/9b0a405a/file_80865.jpg
[14:55:15] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> OK, yes.  What can I do about it?  I'll check again.
[14:58:19] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> It is working for me now too.  But these caching problems are a swine.
[14:58:38] <wm-bb>	 <Richard> Thanks for your help.
[16:44:34] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> yes, the caching issues are a mess. we have it on our radar to work on it.
[16:44:56] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> doesn't the copy and paste feature work for that? (or is it because it is several fragments?) (re @u99of9: Nice. Yesterday I wondered how I could "cut and paste" a whole section of an article to a different place in the article.)
[17:02:51] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> I just ran into this actually. Something I've proposed before is a system where functioneers have the option to run a call where it never uses the cache but still writes to it, thus effectively resetting it. (re @vrandecic: yes, the caching issues are a mess. we have it on our radar to work on it.)
[17:03:26] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> (Limited to functioneers to prevent abuse but it can also be generally available)
[17:31:09] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> The volunteer's corner is right now at https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw (re @Sannita: )
[17:32:08] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> thanks, it seems I forgot again to put the reminder, my sincere apologies (re @Feeglgeef: The volunteer's corner is right now at https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw)
[17:33:02] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> (re @Feeglgeef: The volunteer's corner is right now at https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw)
[22:40:49] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> Many fragments to avoid orchestrator timeouts and WASI issues. (re @vrandecic: doesn't the copy and paste feature work for that? (or is it because it is several fragments?))