[00:48:40] How does the new "pending" thing work? Should I be clicking them all, or will they resolve by the next time the page is reloaded anyway? [01:19:11] They resolve themselves when they’re good and ready, as far as I can tell. (re @u99of9: How does the new "pending" thing work? Should I be clicking them all, or will they resolve by the next time the page is reloade...) [01:27:35] Aha! I found it. My proposed list is here: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json . Updating this can be a job for our first administrator! (re @vrandecic: the list can be changed on-wiki) [02:19:26] impressie : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/edd18b38/file_80917.jpg [02:20:35] Thanks! I've commented there. I mostly agree, but I would make two swaps (re @u99of9: Aha! I found it. My proposed list is here: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions...) [02:59:18] T372684 (re @u99of9: Ah, yes, that appears to reflect the settings of a previous user. I think this is tracked somewhere.) [05:24:23] I just found a language function returning a Chinese monolingual text to a string-scoped function. I assume this just passes through due to lack of validation? I've now protected it one level above by converting to HTML whatever type is returned, but I wonder if this kind of thing is more frequent than we expect? [05:24:23] https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z26039?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3 [05:24:23] A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z26039%22%2C%22Z26039K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q408%22%7D%2C%22Z26039K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q41614%22%7D%2C%22Z26039K3%22%3A%22Z1006%22%7D [06:43:41] Thanks for the robust conversation the other day. I've now adjusted most of the fallbacks to resort to QIDs when they get down below mul on the requested language's fallback list. I've also converted the default functions I use to not use English words (symbols or pseudo-set-theory instead), although of course it would still be better to write language-specific [06:43:41] functions. I think it looks like a better overall fallback. (Swedish may still be cached, because I've been progressively fiddling until now.) : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/fada6107/file_80922.jpg [10:20:41] At least, the text is accurate. (re @wmtelegram_bot: "ويكي الدوال مشروع جديد من مؤسسة ويكيميديا يجري تطويره حاليًا. بعض الميزات قيد التطوير. بإمكانك العثور على مزيد...) [10:21:27] Interesting. (re @u99of9: Thanks for the robust conversation the other day. I've now adjusted most of the fallbacks to resort to QIDs when they get down b...) [10:34:25] They may not all work from right to left. I'd be interested if any stand out as particularly bad. (re @Csisc1994: Interesting.) [14:20:41] *Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252* [14:20:43] * Improved loading and display of Test results [14:20:44] * Recent Changes in the software [14:20:46] * Recording of 8 June Volunteers’ Corner [14:20:47] * Upcoming events [14:20:49] * Fresh Functions weekly: 66 new Functions [14:20:50] https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Status_updates/2026-06-12 [14:21:22] yes, you click on the individually, or reload the page. they shouldn't resolve automatically. More in the newsletter. (re @u99of9: How does the new "pending" thing work? Should I be clicking them all, or will they resolve by the next time the page is reloade...) [19:40:19] any idea why Z34660 fails even using Z34264? it clearly outputs the right value... [20:17:26] It seems a timeout issue (re @wmtelegram_bot: any idea why Z34660 fails even using Z34264? it clearly outputs the right value...) [21:52:02] @dvd_ccc27919: then if it times out how does it show the correct result?? [21:53:04] even more odd, it says "Expected result and actual result are not equal" but when looking into error details it says "Reached time limit in orchestrator" instead... [21:59:20] When it says “Validation error type” it means there was an error in the result validation, not in the evaluation itself. Z34547 fails in evaluation; Z34539 fails in result validation. (re @wmtelegram_bot: even more odd, it says "Expected result and actual result are not equal" but when looking into error details it s...) [21:59:37] @Al: ohhhhhhh [21:59:49] guessing the set equality test times out [22:01:28] yeahhh set equality is recursive [22:01:31] Yes, it looks like either subset test would fail by itself. (re @wmtelegram_bot: guessing the set equality test times out)