[08:40:00] What do people think about a "rate the grammar in this article" feedback scale? Paired with the language, that might help us track where we need to concentrate. [09:00:49] Just for AW or when syndicated to language editions? In principle, I think it’s a good plan, although I’m not sure it’s just the grammar we’re interested in. Also, there may be particular issues that drag down the overall perception. Tracking back from rendered text to the responsible fragment call may be problematic, but highlighting some text and rating it is the sort o [09:00:49] [09:00:50] f UX I’d envisage. [09:00:51] This might work in conjunction with my earlier “insane” fifth point, with dispatch by content ranking (per language), but I think this would be more about local issues rather than overall quality. [09:00:53] On the other hand, a language edition’s policy might be to block articles with a lower rating, which would allow an improved article to unblock itself, or negative ratings to block a previously accepted article. The main issue there would be restricting ratings to the target community, but perhaps here we can just assume good faith? (re @u99of9: What do people think about [09:00:53] a "ra [09:00:54] te the grammar in this article" reader feedback scale? Paired with the language, that might help...) [09:13:43] Hello! Is there documentation on how to use the API to run functions from the command line, e.g. with curl? Specifically, I'd like to understand how the JSON with the function call should look like for Z20616 [09:15:31] With API I mean the Wikifunctions API :) [09:21:32] Maybe here? [09:21:33] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikifunctions_API (re @wmtelegram_bot: Hello! Is there documentation on how to use the API to run functions from the command line, e.g. with curl? Specifically,...) [09:24:38] Z20616 looks particularly hard because it needs a full lexeme as input which will be hard to construct and send. [09:25:01] Al: I did read that! I still get only void as a return value [09:25:37] u99of9: right now I'm passing this: [09:25:57] {'Z1K1': 'Z7', 'Z7K1': 'Z20616', 'Z20616K1': 'L310816'} [09:27:31] I think you should test it out on functions that require simple types first. Or if you're brave, use one that requires a lexeme reference rather than a whole lexeme. [09:27:57] This is not a whole lexeme. (re @wmtelegram_bot: {'Z1K1': 'Z7', 'Z7K1': 'Z20616', 'Z20616K1': 'L310816'}) [09:28:48] I see [09:30:31] I mean, I guess I could create a function on Wikifunctions that takes a lexeme reference, fetches the lexeme and then calls Z20616 [09:32:36] Calling an anonymous function (a lambda in Lisp) is probably nothing the API offers [09:34:55] I think should be able to use Z801 to echo the function call object that represents the required composition 🤷‍♂️ (re @wmtelegram_bot: Calling an anonymous function (a lambda in Lisp) is probably nothing the API offers) [13:26:52] Any chance you also want to try to solve Z36630? (re @dvd_ccc27919: Now I've modified Z27327 to also handle the footpath/pavement situation) [13:33:34] When I'll manage to have time (re @u99of9: Any chance you also want to try to solve Z36630?)