[00:46:45] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> T436486 (re @Al: Yes, I’m pretty sure that would perform better, but it’s not so easy to maintain the associations, because you’d have to look up...)
[17:25:53] <wm-bb>	 <feedmepaperr> we have an attack page, do we have speedy deletion?
[17:26:59] <wm-bb>	 <cvictorovich> Seems no. Where? (re @feedmepaperr: we have an attack page, do we have speedy deletion?)
[17:27:14] <wm-bb>	 <feedmepaperr> [[abstract:Q313940]]
[17:27:30] <wm-bb>	 <feedmepaperr> translates to Hong Myung-bo is trash.
[17:27:40] <wm-bb>	 <Jan_ainali> Just delete the content...
[17:27:42] <wm-bb>	 <cvictorovich> Shall request global sysop deletion (re @feedmepaperr: [[abstract:Q313940]])
[17:28:22] <wm-bb>	 <cvictorovich> But the better approach is to edit the content out (re @cvictorovich: Shall request global sysop deletion)
[17:28:39] <wm-bb>	 <cvictorovich> Later, global sysop REVDEL (re @cvictorovich: Shall request global sysop deletion)
[17:29:02] <wm-bb>	 <Jan_ainali> Regular revert of the edit should work fine too.
[17:29:57] <wm-bb>	 <cvictorovich> Creator blocked (re @feedmepaperr: [[abstract:Q313940]])
[17:30:04] <wm-bb>	 <cvictorovich> Already
[17:30:59] <wm-bb>	 <feedmepaperr> fixed the article.
[17:31:00] <wm-bb>	 <cvictorovich> This isn’t severe enough for suppression etc. (re @feedmepaperr: [[abstract:Q313940]])
[17:31:17] <wm-bb>	 <cvictorovich> Even REVDEL isn’t strictly necessary
[17:31:58] <TenshiHinanawi>	 I don't think anyone mentioned suppression, did they?
[17:32:38] <wm-bb>	 <cvictorovich> Nope. Only telling that this isn’t severe, a simple removal suffices